A Disciplined, Independent
Approach to
OCIO Partner Selection


Leita guides institutions through each stage of the OCIO search process—with expertise, objectivity, and a proven framework.

The Leita Lens

A comprehensive, independent framework for OCIO partner evaluation and selection.
The Leita Lens™ is more than a process—it’s a philosophy grounded in real institutional investment experience, continuous OCIO market research, and a proven, hands-on evaluation methodology. We go beyond surface comparisons, helping investment committees make informed, confident decisions.
01
Independent Perspective
Leita’s recommendations are always objective. With more than 20 years of institutional investment expertise and ongoing due diligence across the OCIO landscape, we serve solely as advocates for fiduciaries. We accept no compensation from OCIO firms or third parties, ensuring your interests come first at every stage.
02
Governance Alignment
Our process begins with a deep dive into your investment governance structure. We collaborate with the Investment Committee to define clear roles, responsibilities, and success criteria—ensuring your objectives and the OCIO’s mandate are aligned from the outset.
03
Targeted Identification
Drawing from our comprehensive OCIO market database and in-depth knowledge of provider models, we identify a focused set of candidates whose capabilities, philosophy, and operating style best fit your institution. This targeted approach streamlines the selection process and elevates the quality of final candidates.
04
Operation Evaluation
Operational fit is critical for long-term OCIO success. We assess how each provider will integrate with your CFO, finance, and operations teams, examining:
  • Portfolio construction
  • Reporting & data tranparency
  • System integration & workflow alignment
  • Transaction execution & cash management
  • Audit support & documentation readiness
05
Disciplined Recommendations
Throughout the process, Leita delivers clear, actionable recommendations. We support the Investment Committee at every stage, from initial screening to final selection—empowering you to make informed decisions with confidence, while always respecting your authority in the selection process.
The Leita Lens™
Portfolio Perfomance Diagnostic
A five minute guided review of long-term objective, risk, strategy, and implementation.
1
Objective
2
Risk
Posture
3
Strategic
Allocation
4
Implementation

Our Process: Four Phases of OCIO Search

Services designed especially for fiduciaries overseeing non-profits. Estimated 4 to 5 months, paced to your governance process.
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Phase 4
1
Align the Investment Committee

Goal: Align on investment model, partner capabilities, and investment philosophy.

Leita begins by aligning the Investment Committee on the OCIO’s role and the organization’s strategic objectives. We present an overview of the investment advisory landscape and gather committee priorities through a brief survey.
Next, we synthesize the committee’s feedback with our expertise to clarify the organization’s investment philosophy and define the essential qualities for an OCIO partner.
We also collaborate with your finance and operations teams to ensure operational requirements are incorporated into the evaluation process from the outset.
Key Outputs: Committee survey and results, search evaluation matrix, and OCIO firm profile.

2
Candidate Interviews and Selection

Goal: Narrow candidate pool intentionally and assess strategic alignment.

Leita identifies a pool of highly qualified OCIO candidates, considering both our independent perspective and firms recommended by the committee.

We begin with a comparative discussion to highlight key differences in investment philosophy, portfolio construction, and service models among providers. Together, we narrow the list to a focused group of firms for introductory virtual interviews.
These brief virtual interviews allow the committee to evaluate how each firm communicates its investment philosophy, market outlook, and partnership approach. The committee meets directly with each firm’s relationship team.
Following these interviews, the committee and Leita collaborate to select a smaller group of firms for comprehensive due diligence in Phase 3.
Key Outputs: Broad candidate universe with one-page profiles, comparative analysis, interview game plan.

3
Tailored Due Diligence

Goal: Deep dive into investment capabilities and operational execution.

Leita conducts thorough due diligence on each firm, reviewing investment implementation, performance history, operational infrastructure, risk management, reporting, conflicts of interest, and fee structures.
We leverage our proprietary database and annual Due Diligence Questionnaire to issue targeted, customized requests based on your priorities. This approach ensures firms focus on what matters most to your organization.
Leita provides a decision-ready analysis that highlights key differentiators, including investment philosophy execution, structural strengths, and operational readiness. This enables the committee to select finalists and set the agenda for Phase 4.
Key Outputs: Customized proposal request from candidates, detailed proposal analysis with Executive Summary, finalist recommendations.

4
Finalist Interviews and Partner Selection

Goal: Evaluate firms on strategic partnership and investment capabilities.

With due diligence complete, the Investment Committee can focus on strategic investment and governance dynamics, confident that each finalist has been thoroughly vetted.
Leita facilitates finalist interviews through dynamic working sessions that assess each firm’s partnership approach, investment capabilities, and decision-making process.
We manage logistics, support next steps, and guide you in making a confident OCIO selection that delivers long-term investment value.
Key Outputs: Final interview game plan, contract and fee negotiations, transition support, project closeout memorandum.

Case Studies

Representative examples of how Leita helps institutions navigate complex investment decisions, evaluate OCIO relationships, and identify partners aligned with their long-term objectives.
Health Conversion Foundation
Mission Implementation Study
$400M Assets | Long-Term Investment Horizon | Health Equity Focus
Regional Healthcare System
Investment Policy Review & OCIO Search
$600M Operating Reserves | Multi-year Strategic Plan
Private Foundation
Investment Advisor Review
$300M Assets | Mature Porfolio | New Committee Leadership
Health Conversion Foundation
Mission Implementation Study
Quick Facts
  • Independent private foundation

  • Approximately $300 million in assets

  • Mature investment program

  • Experienced investment committee

  • New committee leadership

  • Engagement: Investment advisor review and OCIO search


The Situation

A private foundation with a successful long-term investment program sought an independent assessment of its strategy and advisory relationship.

Nothing was broken. The portfolio continued to support spending requirements and preserve purchasing power. However, a new investment committee chair wanted to ensure the foundation remained well-positioned for the future.

The committee was not looking for change for its own sake. Instead, it wanted an objective evaluation of whether the current approach remained the best fit amid an evolving investment landscape.


Key Questions
  • Does the current strategy remain aligned with the foundation's objectives?

  • Is portfolio complexity still justified?

  • Are there new approaches worth considering?

  • How are peer institutions evolving?

  • Which partner is best positioned to support the next decade?


How Leita Helped
  • Facilitated discussions among board members and stakeholders

  • Educated the committee on mission-aligned investment approaches

  • Helped establish a framework for evaluating mission integration

  • Assessed firms' experience with health equity and impact investing

  • Evaluated impact measurement and reporting capabilities

  • Led a structured investment advisor search process

  • Guided finalist evaluation and partner selection


The Outcome

The review provided the committee with a broader perspective on the evolving investment landscape and helped clarify the tradeoffs embedded within various approaches.

After evaluating alternatives, the committee concluded that the incumbent remained the strongest long-term partner. The process reinforced confidence in the existing strategy while identifying opportunities for thoughtful evolution over time.


Key Considerations
  • Health Equity
  • Mission Investing
  • Impact Measurement
  • Governance Alignment
Regional Healthcare System
Investment Policy Review & OCIO Search
Quick Facts
  • Regional healthcare system

  • Approximately $600 million in operating reserves

  • Multi-year strategic plan

  • Capital projects and technology investments under consideration

  • Engagement: Investment policy review and OCIO search


The Situation

A healthcare system was reassessing the role of its operating reserve portfolio amid changing financial realities and strategic priorities.

Leadership faced uncertainty surrounding labor costs, reimbursement pressures, capital investments, and future liquidity needs. While the portfolio had historically been treated as long-term capital, the organization recognized that future demands could require greater flexibility.

Before evaluating providers, the committee needed to determine whether the purpose of the portfolio itself had changed.


Key Questions
  • Has the role of the reserve portfolio changed?

  • How much liquidity should the organization maintain?

  • How should reserves support future capital projects?

  • What level of risk is appropriate?

  • What type of OCIO partner is best suited to the healthcare environment?


How Leita Helped
  • Facilitated alignment between finance leadership and the investment committee

  • Reviewed investment policy and reserve portfolio objectives

  • Evaluated liquidity needs in the context of the strategic plan

  • Assessed governance considerations and risk tolerance

  • Developed a framework for evaluating OCIO providers

  • Led a structured search and finalizt review process


The Outcome

The process helped finance leadership and committee members develop a common framework for evaluating liquidity, risk, and portfolio purpose.

With alignment established, the organization selected an OCIO partner capable of supporting both the strategic plan and the realities of today's healthcare environment.


Key Considerations
  • Operating Reserves
  • Liquidity Planning
  • Healthcare Systems
  • Governance Alignment
Private Foundation
Investment Advisor Review
Quick Facts
  • Independent private foundation

  • Approximately $300 million in assets

  • Mature investment program

  • Experienced investment committee

  • New committee leadership

  • Engagement: Investment advisor review and OCIO search


The Situation

A private foundation with a successful long-term investment program sought an independent assessment of its strategy and advisory relationship.

Nothing was broken. The portfolio continued to support spending requirements and preserve purchasing power. However, a new investment committee chair wanted to ensure the foundation remained well-positioned for the future.

The committee was not looking for change for its own sake. Instead, it wanted an objective evaluation of whether the current approach remained the best fit amid an evolving investment landscape.


Key Questions
  • Does the current strategy remain aligned with the foundation's objectives?

  • Is portfolio complexity still justified?

  • Are there new approaches worth considering?

  • How are peer institutions evolving?

  • Which partner is best positioned to support the next decade?


How Leita Helped
  • Conducted an independent review of the existing investment program

  • Evaluated governance structure and decision-making processes

  • Assessed portfolio complexity and implementation considerations

  • Provided perspective on industry trends and peer practices

  • Conducted a structured review of advisory alternatives

  • Facilitated committee discussions and evaluation


The Outcome

The review provided the committee with a broader perspective on the evolving investment landscape and helped clarify the tradeoffs embedded within various approaches.

After evaluating alternatives, the committee concluded that the incumbent remained the strongest long-term partner. The process reinforced confidence in the existing strategy while identifying opportunities for thoughtful evolution over time.


Key Considerations
  • Governance REview
  • OCIO Search
  • Private Foundations
  • Portfolio Complexity

Frequently Asked Questions

What role does Leita play during an OCIO search?

Leita serves as an independent advisor throughout the search process, but our role extends well beyond writing RFPs and coordinating meetings. We help committees clarify what they are solving for, identify the right candidates, and evaluate firms through The Leita Lens™. Every meeting has an objective, and we work hard to make sure committee time is used effectively. We bring candor, curiosity, and perspective developed over years of evaluating OCIO partnerships, but the decisions always belong to our clients.

We also work closely with CFOs and finance teams. Leita manages as much of the day-to-day search process as possible, including timelines, scheduling, and follow-up, so staff can stay focused on their many other responsibilities. We believe investment decisions and implementation are two sides of the same coin. A successful partnership has to work well for both committees and finance teams, so we spend considerable time understanding how OCIOs support their clients and operate day to day.

Our goal is to help organizations maintain momentum through a complex search process, make informed decisions, and build investment partnerships that deliver long-term value.

What role do staff and the investment committee play during an OCIO search?

An OCIO search requires active engagement from both staff and the investment committee over the course of several months. Most organizations should expect a series of meetings and interviews at key decision points, along with some work between meetings to review materials and provide feedback.

To help manage time and make intermediate decisions more efficiently, Leita typically recommends a search subcommittee with three to five representatives from the investment committee and finance leadership. The investment committee is responsible for the ultimate decision and provides guidance on investment philosophy and long-term priorities. The search subcommittee works closely with Leita to vet candidates and guide the process between full committee meetings.

CFOs and finance team input helps ensure the selected partner will work well with your organizational processes, including reporting, operations, and implementation.

Leita manages as much of the process as possible so that committee and staff time can be used efficiently. We coordinate timelines, prepare materials, and keep the search moving. The goal is to bring the right information to the right people at the right time, so your organization can make informed decisions without the search becoming a full-time responsibility.

How long does an OCIO search typically take?

Most OCIO searches with Leita take four to six months from initial discussions through final selection. Organizations conducting a search without a specialized OCIO search firm should generally expect six to nine months, depending on committee schedules and the complexity of the process. The single largest variable in an OCIO search managed by Leita is usually scheduling. In a do-it-yourself search, it is often the number of candidates. Committee calendars, special meetings, and the availability of key stakeholders determine the pace. Leita works closely with clients to maintain momentum and design a process that is both thorough and efficient.

For a deeper discussion of timelines and the work involved, see our article, “How Much Time Does an OCIO Search Require?”

How do we know we are ready to begin an OCIO search?

Most organizations do not need to have every question answered before beginning an OCIO search. In fact, trying to resolve every investment issue in advance often creates unnecessary work.

You do not need to rewrite your Investment Policy Statement before beginning a search. You do not need to have your next asset allocation figured out. And you do not need to settle every debate around active versus passive management or alternatives.

Many organizations use the search process itself to gather information and refine their thinking. What matters most is understanding the role you want the investment committee, finance team, and OCIO to play. We work with clients to define that model at the beginning of the search, before discussing candidates. Those decisions shape the process and help determine which firms are likely to be a good fit.

Institutions do not need unanimous agreement on every issue, but they do need a willingness to evaluate new information and make decisions. A search works best when committees are open-minded and ready to move forward. Leita’s process is designed to give organizations the information they need when they need it. We handle as much of the work as possible so committees and staff can focus on the decisions that matter most.

Does Leita use an RFP process?

Yes, but probably not the kind of RFP process you are imagining.

Leita believes that RFP responses alone are not sufficient to evaluate how an OCIO provider will perform as a long-term partner. We spend considerable time meeting with firms throughout the year, conducting due diligence, visiting offices, and understanding how these organizations make investment decisions. That experience helps us spend less time gathering basic information and more time focusing on the questions that matter most.

Our process includes introductory meetings between clients and candidates before detailed proposals are prepared. Those conversations allow firms to understand the organization and provide more thoughtful, customized responses. As a result, our RFPs tend to be shorter and more focused. We do not need to ask firms table-stakes questions that are already covered through ongoing due diligence. Instead, we emphasize case studies, implementation, and the issues that are most important to your organization. Expect 40-page responses, not 400-page responses.

RFPs are an important tool, but partnerships do not happen on paper.

How does Leita evaluate OCIO providers?

Before evaluating firms, Leita works with committees and staff to define what matters most to the organization. Through a combination of surveys, discussion, and experience, we build a framework for evaluating candidates through The Leita Lens™.

Committees often have different priorities. Some care deeply about education and engagement. Others prioritize investment philosophy, resources, or fees. We use those conversations to create an evaluation matrix that focuses meeting time on the issues that matter most. Not every factor receives equal weight, and not every issue needs to consume committee time. Leita performs broad due diligence on every candidate, including investment philosophy, organizational quality, operations, and implementation. We also incorporate more traditional OCIO analytics such as fees and performance. Certain areas, particularly operations and transition, are important enough that we evaluate them regardless of where they rank in committee surveys.

There is no perfect OCIO. Different firms have different strengths and tradeoffs, and Leita does not maintain a buy list or recommend the same firms to every client. Our process is designed to help organizations identify the partner that best fits their needs and priorities. The right OCIO partnership starts here.

Should we include our incumbent OCIO provider in the search?

In most cases, yes. Including the incumbent allows institutions to evaluate whether the current relationship remains the best fit and provides a useful benchmark when comparing other providers. It is also generally appropriate to give a long-standing partner the opportunity to participate in the process.

There are exceptions. If the organization is pursuing a different service model or there is a clear mismatch between the institution’s needs and the incumbent’s capabilities, including the incumbent may not make sense. Absent those circumstances, Leita generally encourages organizations to include the incumbent OCIO.

How many OCIO firms should we include in a search?

Most nonprofits need fewer firms than they initially expect, but arriving at the right shortlist is important.

Leita typically begins with a broad universe of candidates and narrows the field as the process progresses. A typical search might start with ten well-chosen firms from our OCIO universe of 100+ providers, narrow to five after introductory discussions, then four that submit proposals, then three finalists, and ultimately one partner.

As committees learn more about the firms and the firms learn more about the organization, priorities become clearer and comparisons become more meaningful. By the time detailed due diligence begins, most organizations benefit from concentrating their efforts on a relatively small number of candidates. There is no magic number, and different organizations have different needs. The search process should provide enough breadth to understand the marketplace and enough depth to develop conviction in the final decision.

When should an institution consider changing OCIO providers?

Institutions often evaluate their OCIO relationship when something has changed. That change may involve leadership, governance, spending needs, investment objectives, service expectations, or the OCIO itself. Concerns around communication, reporting, operations, or organizational changes within the provider can also prompt a search.

A search does not always lead to a change. Sometimes the best outcome is renewed confidence in an existing partnership. In Leita’s experience, approximately three out of four searches result in a change. We believe that percentage reflects both the rapid evolution of the OCIO industry over the last decade and the reality that organizations often begin a search because something no longer feels quite right.

Because selecting an OCIO is such an important decision, institutions should periodically evaluate whether their current partner remains the best fit. Many nonprofits only conduct a search every ten years, and the work involved can make it tempting to postpone the process. We generally encourage organizations to reassess their options periodically rather than wait until frustrations become significant.

Organizational changes at an OCIO provider, including mergers, acquisitions, or ownership changes, deserve particular attention. Those events do not automatically require a search, but they often warrant a thoughtful review of the relationship. For more on this topic, see “What Should Nonprofits Do When Their OCIO Is Acquired?”

Can Leita help institutions hiring an OCIO for the first time?

Yes. Many institutions engage Leita when considering an OCIO model for the first time. The transition from a traditional investment consultant structure to an OCIO relationship involves important decisions about governance, delegation, operations, and investment philosophy. Before discussing candidates, we work with clients to define the role they want the investment committee, finance team, and OCIO to play.

Once those roles are clear, we help organizations understand the marketplace and identify partners that fit their needs and priorities for closer consideration.

Can Leita help evaluate an existing OCIO relationship without conducting a full search?

Yes. Institutions generally approach this question in one of two ways.

Some organizations want a comprehensive evaluation of their current provider. These engagements are designed to answer a single question: does the existing partnership continue to meet the organization’s needs? Because we believe alignment matters, these reviews are standalone projects. We do not conduct an incumbent evaluation with the expectation that it will lead to a search.

Other organizations are uncertain whether a search is necessary. In those cases, we often begin with the early stages of a search. Together, we clarify roles and priorities, and benchmark the incumbent against a preliminary set of alternatives informed by Leita’s ongoing due diligence and proprietary knowledge base. At that point, the organization can decide whether to continue with a full search or conclude that the existing relationship remains the best fit. Sometimes the answer is renewed confidence in the incumbent. Sometimes it is a new partnership. Our role is to help organizations make that decision thoughtfully and without unnecessary work.

How much does an OCIO search consultant cost?

Leita charges a flat project fee that covers the entire engagement, from initial assessment through transition support. We do not charge asset-based fees, and we do not receive compensation from OCIO providers.

The cost of an OCIO search varies depending on the complexity of the engagement, the size of the institution, and the scope of services required. Leita works with each client to design an approach that reflects their needs and governance structure. During an introductory conversation, we can discuss your institution's objectives and provide guidance on what a search engagement may involve.

How do we get started?

The process begins with an introductory conversation to understand your institution, what you are trying to solve, and the questions you have about the OCIO marketplace. From there, Leita can help determine whether an OCIO search consultant would add value and outline potential next steps.